Tuesday, August 26, 2008

The military's growing foreign aid role: a bibliography

Over the past few years, Congress has acceded to several Defense Department requests to use its own budget to provide military assistance, something that it was not legally able to do on its own after 1961, when the Foreign Assistance Act became law.

The result has been a profusion of Pentagon-budget programs that provide military aid very similar to what is already provided through the foreign aid budget. The difference is that these new Defense Department programs have less (or sometimes no) involvement from the State Department; little or no oversight from the congressional foreign relations and foreign-aid committees; fewer legal restrictions on their use, including human rights restrictions; and greater obstacles to obtaining information about their use, due to lighter public reporting requirements.

Examples of such Defense Department programs on the "Just the Facts" website include "Section 1004" Counter-Drug Assistance (begun in 1991, the second-largest source of military and police aid to the region this year), the Regional Defense Counter-Terrorism Fellowship Program (begun in 2003, the fourth-largest trainer of personnel from the region), and the "Section 1206" Train and Equip Authority (begun in 2006, the fourth-largest source of aid this year). (See a full list.)

The Defense Department has made clear its desire to increase these programs' scope and to make them permanent. The result in the past two years has been an increasing debate about the Pentagon's greater role in foreign assistance, and about the military's growing foreign policy role in general.

Here is a bibliography of links to some of the key documents in what is still a very new debate.

Congress:

  • July 31, 2008: Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on "Defining the Military's Role Towards Foreign Policy"

    • Rough hearing transcript (voice-recognition, from CSPAN)
    • Audio [MP3] and Video [streaming]
    • [PDF] Statement of Committee Chairman Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Delaware)
    • [PDF] Statement of Committee Ranking Minority Member Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Indiana)
    • [PDF] Testimony of Deputy Secretary of State John D. Negroponte
    • [PDF] Testimony of Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Eric Edelman
    • [PDF] Testimony of George Rupp, CEO and President,
      International Rescue Committee
    • [PDF] Testimony of Reuben E. Brigety II,
      Director of the Sustainable Security
      Program, Center for American Progress
    • [PDF] Testimony of Mary Locke,
      Former Senior Professional Staff,
      Committee on Foreign Relations
    • [PDF] Testimony of Robert M. Perito,
      Senior Program Officer,
      Center for Post-Conflict Peace
      and Stability Operations,
      United States Institute of Peace
  • April 15, 2008: House Armed Services Committee hearing on "Building Partnership Capacity and Development of the Interagency Process"

    • Audio [MP3] Part 1, Part 2
    • Statement of Committee Chairman Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Missouri)
    • [PDF] Testimony of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
    • [PDF] Testimony of Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates

Defense Department:

State Department:

Other U.S. Government:

Non-Governmental Organizations and Think-Tanks:

Press:

Friday, August 8, 2008

Colombia in the "coalition"?

Afghan police training last year in Colombia. (From El Tiempo.)

Colombia's Defense Ministry has acknowledged that it is considering a request from the government of Spain to send a contingent of troops to Afghanistan. This possibility was first raised in Thursday's edition of Spain's El País newspaper, excerpted below.

If Bogotá says "yes," Colombia's would become the first Latin American military to accompany NATO forces in Afghanistan. El Salvador has maintained a small military contingent in Iraq since shortly after the 2003 U.S. invasion.

The Salvadoran military has most likely received U.S. assistance from Defense-budget accounts created to aid members of the U.S.-led "coalitions" in Iraq and Afghanistan. (We have not seen a dollar amount for such aid to El Salvador, though it is likely part of the $123.3 million that the Government Accountability Office lists, on page 11 of this report [PDF], as having been given to "other nations" operating in Iraq between March 2003 and March 2007. Until we find out how much El Salvador has received, any Iraq-related funding is not reflected in El Salvador's "Just the Facts" entry.)

If it sends a contingent to Afghanistan, would Colombia's military then qualify for some of the Defense-budget "Coalition Support" or "Lift and Sustain" funds (described in this Defense Department budget-request annex [PDF]) that have generally gone to countries like Pakistan, Jordan, Poland, and others participating in the Iraq and Afghanistan missions? Yes, it probably would. Would such funds offset recent reductions in military and police assistance to Colombia? Probably not, but the possibility cannot be dismissed.

From Thursday's El País:

Sources with knowledge of the conversations have confirmed to El País that Colombia, Spain and NATO have been in three-way negotiations for months about the incorporation of Colombian troops. While the details have still not been completed, the idea is that Bogotá would contribute a company of some 100 troops to the Spanish detachment in Qal-i-Naw, capital of the province of Badghis, in the northwest of the country.

For Spain, the arrival of the Colombian troops, foreseen for next spring, would be an unrepayable contribution, since it would allow the completion of a reduced rapid-reaction battalion with which to confront ever more-frequent incidents in a territory with 400,000 inhabitants and an area similar to that of Galicia, whose security so far depends on 200 Spanish military personnel.

For NATO, the Spanish mediation facilitates things, since Spain would provide the Colombian troops with training, infrastructure and even equipment. ...

The most interested in the operation is Colombia. Participation in the Afghanistan conflict would reinforce its role as the privileged interlocutor of the United States and its allies in Latin America. For one thing, it would participate in NATO's periodic meetings with the countries that contribute to the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) but do not belong to the organization (14 of 40).

In the medium term, Colombia's aspiration is to incorporate itself into the group formed by Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, countries that, for geographic reasons, cannot aspire to join NATO but who share, according to the alliance itself, its "strategic concerns and values." With the exception of Japan, whose legislation limits its participation in foreign military missions, the other three "contact countries," as NATO calls them, have troops in Afghanistan or have been invited to send them. ...

The issue was raised last July 5 by the Defense Minister [of Spain], Carme Chacón, with her Colombian counterpart, Juan Manuel Santos, whom she received in Madrid. For their part, Colombian military personnel have already visited two Spanish bases in Afghanistan: Herat and Qal-i-Naw.

In addition, in what constitutes a first step, Afghan police have received anti-narcotics training in Colombia. It is not insignificant that the current U.S. ambassador in Kabul, William B. Wood, served before in Bogotá.

From the website of Colombia's El Tiempo newspaper later Thursday:

The Iberian nation's Defense Ministry indicated that the security-force members' arrival is an issue in the Colombian government's hands, and that it would take effect in 2009.

"It is under study, it is not confirmed. Details remain" with regard to "what shape the integration would take, and in what contingent," a source in the Spanish Defense Ministry told Agénce France Presse. ...

High-ranking sources in the Colombian Defense Ministry, however, assured that the scenario of Colombian soldiers in combat in Afghanistan is improbable, and that instead they have thought of sending members of the Engineers' Battalion and units specialized in de-mining. ...

The police has already trained anti-narcotics commandos from that country [Afghanistan] at the base in Pijaos, in Espinal (Tolima). The Colombian delegation in Afghanistan is headed by Gen. Gustavo Matamoros Camacho, the army's chief of commando operations.

Syndicate content